The Media Spoon-Fed Us a Man Getting Shot on Facebook Live and We Ate It All Up

I’m tired of sensationalism.

With the advent of social media and the internet superhighway it seems as though nothing is off limits or out of bounds. In approximately 7-10 seconds you can type anything–literally anything–into a search bar and get all sorts of results. These results that you receive can vary in format: video, pictures, or articles  and can come from a wide variety of sources. These sources are hungry for your clicks and will do just about anything to attract you to their content.

You see it all the time–whether it’s a scantily clad woman (or man), a risque or explicit story, or a horrific act of violence, the media delights in acquiring various types of bait and with tantalizes us with attractive lures such as:

“You Won’t Believe What Happened To This Woman After Her Husband Caught Her CHEATING.”

“Ten People Who are Dumber Than They Look.”

“These Victims Passed Away In Gruesome Ways: Number 4 Made Me Squirm.”

Sound familiar? We often refer to these lures as “clickbait” but the truth is we consume and become fat with the fear, violence, and lust that comes at us from all angles through advertising, appeal, and the evil in our souls.

The most recent form of clickbait has come from the grave and the deepest darkness of a man’s heart. Yesterday on Easter of all holidays, Steve Stephens of Cleveland gunned down 74 year old Robert Godwin in cold blood and filmed it on Facebook Live. He then went on for close to twenty minutes talking about other people he killed as the feed rolled on and on. The video stayed up on Facebook  for several hours before it was taken down.

By then it was too late. Hundreds of sources embedded the video and broadcast it to the masses, wielding attractive headlines such as “Shocking: Man Gunned Down on Facebook Live. Viewer Discretion Advised.” Of course this title was not meant to dissuade anyone. It’s as ludicrous as Budweiser telling its patrons to drink responsibly when we all know they want us to drink our guts out.

On cue the masses flocked to these sites to watch the murder, boosting revenues and feeding the hunger that rests in the darkest part of us all–the desire to see bloodshed, the thirst to explore the consciousness of a deeply disturbed mind.

It’s no different than the Romans and their “bread and circuses” mentality. Stuff the people with food, entertainment, and violence so that they forget–forget how to love, forget how live, forget how to feel.  Nothing is sacred anymore–nothing is private. Gone are the days of respecting secrecy and silent mourning, gone are the days of blissful ignorance. Everything is now in the open for all to see and consume.

So what do we do in this open information age? First, it’s vital that we keep our eyes on what is truly important: our faith, our families, and our attitude towards others. Second, it’s necessary that we adjust our perspective on the world and understand the broader picture.

Don’t become a victim of sensationalism. Don’t flock to sex, violence, and the darkness of the world like sheep who consume whatever grass their led to. Be sober and vigilant.

Pursue the light.





  1. His last name is spelled Stephens.

    I would normally agree with you about sensationalism however in this case it’s a matter of life and death.

    The public needs to be warned and aware of this dangerous individual. The sensationalism that we crave as a society (God help us) can be used in cases like this to help catch dangerous individuals as well as save countless lives.

    That being said, I do appreciate your view points on the subject matter and, as I said before, would agree with you most of the time.

    Afterthought: Are you promoting more sensationalism by giving it credence with this post?

    Just asking.


    1. Thank you for your comment and the correction on the spelling, Brad. Feedback is always appreciated. I’m definitely not contesting the fact that the news should have been reported–absolutely it should have been. My grievances lie with the fact that the video of the murder was openly broadcast by a variety of sources with little to no sensitivity for the grieving family. This is the type of sensationalism I’m talking about–the kind where knowing the story isn’t enough…we need to see the story transpire before our very eyes in all of its gruesomeness and wickedness–all for profits and ratings.
      As far as your question of am I promoting sensationalism I would argue that, no I’m not. If I posted the video link or embedded the video itself on to the site then one could accuse me of that. What I’m merely attempting to do is to change the status quo of how we consume media by protesting the use of violent and lustful media in order to shock and appeal to mankind’s fleshly nature. It is not my intent to glorify this man or situation in any way–but rather to warn all of us of the danger of buying into the media frenzy.

      Once again, I thank you for your feedback.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s